JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This order shall dispose
of SAO No. 20 of 2004 titled Gurmit Kaur v.
Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange,
SAO No. 21 of 2004 titled Saudagar Singh
v. Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
and SAO No. 22 of 2004 titled Major Manjit
Singh Dhillon v. Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange.
For the sake of brevity, facts
are taken from SAO No. 20 of 2004.
(2.) The present appellants raised the following questions of law for determination
by this Court :-
1]. Whether the statement of an accused
taken while he is in custody and which subsequently stands retracted can be the basis
for imposing penalty?
2]. Whether the statement of persons recorded under Section 40 of the FERA Act
and not produced for cross-examination
could be taken into consideration for imposing penalty under the provisions of FERA ?
3]. Whether the present case is based on
no evidence and, therefore, finding recorded
are based on no evidence and, therefore, liable to be set aside ?
(3.) The appellants were issued show
cause notice for contravening the provisions
of Section 9(1), 9(b) & 9(1)(d) of the Foreign
Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter
referred to as FERA, 1973).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.