JEETO @ SMT. MANJIT KAUR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(P&H)-2007-7-81
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on July 17,2007

Jeeto @ Smt. Manjit Kaur Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

VINOD K.SHARMA, J. - (1.) THIS revision petition has been filed to challenge the order dated 6.11.2006 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Gurdaspur, vide which the application moved by the petitioner under Order 18, Rule 17-A read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for adducing additional evidence has been ordered to be dismissed.
(2.) THE petitioner filed a suit for declaration to the effect that she was legally wedded to late Shri Wazir Singh and being legal heir of the deceased was entitled to medical pension of her late husband. A prayer was made for mandatory injunction for transfer of pension of the petitioner's husband in the name of the petitioner and interest @ 12% per annum was also claimed. Further injunction was prayed restraining defendant No. 4 not to release pension to any one else except the petitioner. In the said suit, the petitioner moved an application to lead additional evidence to prove on record the petition moved by her under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act as well as the order passed thereon. It was claimed that she being an illiterate lady was not aware of the said fact and immediately on coming to know about the same, the present application was moved.
(3.) THE application was contested on the plea that the application had been moved to delay the proceedings. The averments made on merit were denied to be false. It was also claimed that the said evidence was not essential for the adjudication of the case.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.