JUDGEMENT
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU,J. -
(1.) This is an appeal by the Insurance Company (Reliance General Insurance Company Limited) against the Award dated 2.12.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hoshiarpur (for short
'the Tribunal') arising out of the death of Amarjit Singh in a vehicular accident.
Brief facts of the case are that on 29.11.2014 at about 8.00 P.M., Amarjit Singh (deceased) was going
on his motorcycle bearing No.BP -07AQ -9757 from his village Jiyan to village Possi to meet his
sister -in -law. When he reached near DS Dhaba, Saila Khurd and while he was overtaking one truck,
his motorcycle struck against the car bearing No.PB -07R -1731 coming from opposite side. The car
was being driven by Shashi Kant - respondent No.3. As a result of the collision, Amarjit Singh
suffered multiple injuries on his head and other parts of the body. He was shifted to Raja Hospital,
Nawanshaher, where, the doctors declared him 'brought dead'. DDR NO.15 dated 30.11.2014 was
recorded in Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur on the statement of Kulwinder Kaur -
respondent No.1, wife of the deceased.
(2.) The wife and son of the deceased filed claim petition under Section 163 - A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming compensation to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/ - for the death of Amarjit Singh in the accident.
On notice, the owner and driver of the offending car - respondent No.3 appeared and filed written
statement taking the plea that no accident was caused by his car and in fact, the deceased himself
struck his motorcycle against the truck, as a result of which, he fell down on the road and received
injuries. Respondent No.3 was passing from the road at that time and he provided help to the
injured on humanitarian ground. The appellant - insurer filed separate written statement pleading
collusion between the claimants and respondent No.3.
(3.) The Tribunal framed the following issues for adjudication in the claim petition: -
"1. Whether the deceased Amarjit Singh had died in Motor Vehicular Accident, which took place on 29.11.2014 due to rash and negligent driving of respondent No.1 while driving the offending vehicle i.e. Car bearing no.PB -07R -1731? OPA
2. Whether the claimants being legal heirs of deceased are entitled to receive compensation. If so, to what extent and from which of the respondents? OPA
3. Whether respondent No.1 was not having valid driving licence at the time of accident? OPR -2
4. Whether the petition is bad for non -joinder and misjoinder of necessary parties? OPR -2
5. Whether the claim petition has been filed in collusion with respondent No.1? OPR -2
6. Relief." ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.