M/S DASHMESH GOODS CARRIER Vs. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (PUNJAB) AND ANOTHER
LAWS(P&H)-2016-10-127
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on October 07,2016

M/S Dashmesh Goods Carrier Appellant
VERSUS
Food Corporation Of India (Punjab) And Another Respondents

JUDGEMENT

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,J. - (1.) In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing respondent No.1 to consider the representation/email dated 27.09.2016 (Annexure P-4) and accept the affidavit/declaration before allotment of contract, in respect of Employees Provident Fund, which could not be submitted/uploaded along with the tender documents due to some technical fault on 26.09.2016.
(2.) A few facts necessary for adjudication of the instant petition as narrated therein may be noticed. Respondent No.1 floated public tender for appointment of transport contractor at Raikot, Tehsil Malerkotla, District Sangrur for carrying out transport work from various godowns to rail head. As per the instructions, petitioner got all the documents uploaded and submitted along with tender on 26.09.2016 i.e. the last day for submission of tender. After the petitioner came to know that at the time of uploading of Format B "Affidavit" to be submitted in respect of payment of EPF defaults by bidders who are not having any EPF proceedings pending against them at the time of submission of tenders", the front-side of the affidavit was not uploaded and only backside of the affidavit was uploaded, the petitioner immediately submitted representation/email dated 27.09.2016 at 8.49 a.m. to respondent No.1 to the effect that affidavit regarding EPF (front-side) was not uploaded due to some technical reason and further submitted the affidavit and requested to take it on record and consider the same at the time of the technical evaluation of tender to be held on 27.09.2016. On 27.09.2016 when petitioner approached the office of respondent No.1, it was informed orally that his tender will not be entertained since the affidavit has not been submitted properly. Hence, present writ petition.
(3.) After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any merit in the writ petition.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.