JUDGEMENT
MAHESH GROVER, J. -
(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 30.10.2015.
(2.) In existence is a Scheme known as "Swatantarta Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as "the Scheme"). Father of the
petitioner, namely Norang, who was a freedom fighter and admitted to the
benefit under the Scheme, died on 8.2.1994 leaving behind his wife, who
died on 12.6.1995, survived by the appellant, who is his daughter, as the
sole biological survivor, even though, Norang, during his life time, had
adopted his brother's son, namely Prem, who had also expired. The
appellant is a divorcee and thus, has prayed that in the given set of
circumstances, she, being the sole surviving heir, was entitled to the
benefit of pension being drawn under the Scheme by her late father and
lastly by her widowed mother. The benefit has been denied to her on the
ground of ineligibility as prescribed in the Scheme dated 15.8.1981. The
relevant of which may be extracted herebelow:-
"2. WHO ARE ELIGIBLE DEPENDENTS:
For the purpose of grant of Samman pension, family include (if the freedom fighter is not alive), mother, father, widower/widow if he/she has not since remarried, unmarried daughters.
Not more than one eligible dependent can be granted pension and in the event of availability of more than one dependent the sequence of eligibility will be widow/widower, unmarried daughters, mother and father."
(3.) The learned Single Judge, after noticing that since a divorcee is not included in the list of eligible dependents, even though an unmarried
daughter does find mention, negated the claim of the appellant which is
now the cause of grievance to her.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.