JUDGEMENT
DAYA CHAUDHARY,J. -
(1.) This petition has been filed under Section 482
Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.151 dated 20.08.2010 registered under
Sections 406, 498-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station
Division No.7 (Vardhaman), City Ludhiana.
(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. In the petition filed under Section
125 Cr.P.C., it was stated by the complainant herself that all dowry articles were sent to Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) one day prior to the marriage
and this fact was also admitted in her cross-examination before Judicial
Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana. Learned counsel further submits that no
cause of action arose at Ludhiana as neither any act of cruelty nor
demand of dowry was made at Ludhiana. Even the complainant has not stated
any time, date and month of calling of the Panchayat at Ludhiana. As per
FIR, it was a simple marriage and the present FIR has been registered in
a preplanned manner with malafide intention in connivance with Police. At
the end, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that lodging of FIR
against the present petitioners is an abuse of process of law and as
such, continuation of proceedings would not only cause irreparable loss
but it will also result into failure of justice.
(3.) Heard arguments of learned counsel for the petitioners and have also perused the allegations levelled in the FIR.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.