SAPNA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
LAWS(P&H)-2016-4-283
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on April 06,2016

Sapna And Others Appellant
VERSUS
State Of Haryana And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This order shall dispose of the above five petitions as common question of facts are involved in all these petitions. However, for the facility of reference, the facts are being taken from CWP No.3932 of 2016. As per the District Legal Services Authority Rules, 1995, the appointment to the Group C and D posts was to be made by the Chairman, District Level Legal Service Authority. Subsequently, on account of large number of vacancies and paucity of staff, the Chairman of the State Legal Service Authorities, referred the matter for selection to the Central Recruitment Agency, which has been created to facilitate selection process. other connected matters The aim and object of the Society is to provide an effective, efficient, public centered, transparent selection mechanism for recruitment and training of staff in the Subordinate Courts of States of Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory of Chandigarh and others offices/institutions which may be entrusted from time to time to get their services.
(2.) In pursuance to the aim and object of the Society, the Chairman of the State Legal Services Authority, has made a request vide letter dated 08.01.2014 (Annexure R-3/2), to get the selection of above said posts of Clerk and other posts from the agency and in the case of the petitioners, the decision was taken to give relaxation in age up to 7 years. After the decision was taken on 08.01.2014 (Annexure R-3/2), the advertisement (Annexure P-14) was issued on 31.05.2014. The petitioners have participated in the selection process. The only claim was present in the present petitions is that as per the representations the case for regularization be considered by the respondent's-authority. Since, the Chairman, State Legal Services Authority, has referred the matter for selection as per the aims and object of the Society the selection process has been initiated and considered correctly.
(3.) The interim order dated 26.02.2016, passed by this Court stands vacated and the respondents can proceed with the appointment of the selected candidates through the competent authority. The respondent No.1 has further stated in the written statement that the case for regularization of the petitioners has been recommended to the State Government. At this stage, counsel for the petitioners does not press these writ petitions for quashing of the selection conducted by the Central Recruitment Agency. They restricts their prayer that in view of the continuity of their services as per the appointment letters, the petitioners are working on temporary basis for the last 3 years, the government shall consider their case for regularization as the posts are still lying vacant. Mr. Gurminder Singh, Senior Advocate, on instructions from Member Secretary, Haryana State Legal Services Authority, has informed that the matter has been referred to State Government for consideration the case for regularization on 07.12.2015.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.