KAMAL NAIN Vs. POOJA RANI
LAWS(P&H)-2016-5-184
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on May 03,2016

Kamal Nain Appellant
VERSUS
Pooja Rani Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Raj Mohan Singh, J. - (1.) Husband-appellant remained unsuccessful in his endeavour to seek annulment of marriage under Section 12(i)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act. 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') before the trial Court.
(2.) Appellant submitted that his marriage was solemnized with respondent-Pooja Rani on 28.04.2007 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies, but the marriage could not be consummated on account of physical deformity and infection in the private parts of the respondent-wife. Appellant alleged that the physical deformity was of such type that even the wife was ashamed of disclosing it. She had no interest in physical relations with the appellant. Appellant further alleged that a fraud was played with him by concealing physical deformity and infection in the private parts of the respondent and he was misled to marry her. Therefore, he prayed that marriage be declared null and void under Section 12 of the Act.
(3.) Appellant pleaded that the respondent and her parents filed false and frivolous complaints against him and his family members under Sections 406, 498-A IPC and under the provisions of Dowry Act. Respondent also filed complaint before the Sr. Supdt. of Police, Barnala which was inquired into and dismissed by the Police.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.