ARJUN SINGH Vs. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
LAWS(P&H)-2016-5-764
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on May 06,2016

ARJUN SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DARSHAN SINGH,J. - (1.) The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 04.02.2016 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kurukshetra, whereby the application filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter called "CPC"), has been dismissed.
(2.) I have heard Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate counsel for the respondents and carefully gone through the paper book.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners/plaintiffs had filed the suit for permanent injunction but during the pendency of the suit the respondents/defendants carried out demolition of the disputed property. He contended that due to the said demolition, which is a subsequent event, the respondents/defendants want to add the relief of mandatory injunction and consequential amendments.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.