JUDGEMENT
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. -
(1.) Prayer in the present writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to
reinstate the petitioner in service and to fix his pay of the period
during which, he remained out of service and also to treat the period
under suspension to be on duty and to pay all consequential benefits by
modifying order dated 10.05.2013 (Annexure P-1) and setting aside order
dated 13.03.2014 (Annexure P-2).
(2.) Briefly, the facts of the case as made out in the present writ petition are that, the petitioner was appointed as Constable in the
Punjab Police on 22.07.1975. He was confirmed after three years of
service. On 02.11.1988, FIR No.123 was registered under Sections 336, 506
read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against him and one Nirmal
Singh Constable. Both of them were convicted by the Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Ropar under Sections 336, 448 and 506 IPC vide judgment dated
12.06.1991 and were sentenced to undergo RI for a maximum period of six months. As a result thereof, the services of the petitioner as well as
said Nirmal Singh were terminated by a composite order dated 19.06.1991
(Annexure P-3).
(3.) Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court, the petitioner as well as said Nirmal Singh filed
separate appeals before Additional Sessions Judge, Rupnagar. The appeal
filed by Nirmal Singh was allowed and he was acquitted of the charge.
However, the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed. Said Nirmal
Singh was reinstated in service from the date of dismissal i.e.,
12.06.1991 and was given all consequential benefits including the period he remained out of service.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.