MANDEEP KAUR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
LAWS(P&H)-2016-3-286
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on March 28,2016

MANDEEP KAUR Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DAYA CHAUDHARY,J. - (1.) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of order dated 4.1.2016 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur in case FIR No. 33 dated 30.7.2015 registered under Sections 376,366,354-D and 506 IPC at Police Station Ghuman Kalan, District Gurdaspur, whereby, the application moved by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning respondents No.2 and 3 as an additional accused has been dismissed.
(2.) Briefly the facts of the case are that on the basis of complaint made by the petitioner, aforesaid FIR was registered against accused- Kulwinder Singh and respondents No.2 and 3 but final report under section 173 Cr.P.C. was filed against accused-Kulwinder Singh only and respondents No.2 and 3 were declared innocent and were kept in column No.2. The charges were framed against Kulwinder Singh only. The statement of the complainant was recorded before the trial Court and thereafter an application was moved under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning respondent No.2 and 3 as an additional accused. The said application was dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur vide order dated 4.1.2016, which is subject matter of challenge in the present petition.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that respondents No.2 and 3 were wrongly declared innocent, whereas, there were specific allegations against them. They were also involved in the commission of offence as they facilitated the main accused to commit the offence. Not only their names were mentioned in the FIR but specific role was also attributed to them in the statement of the complainant recorded before the trial Court. There was sufficient evidence available on record to summon respondents No.2 and 3 as an additional accused to face trial. Learned counsel has also relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab and others 2014(1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 623 : 2014(1) Recent Apex Judgments (R.A.J.) 384 : 2014 (3) SCC 92, in support of his contentions.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.