JUDGEMENT
DAYA CHAUDHARY,J. -
(1.) The present petition has been filed under Section
482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of order dated 4.1.2016 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur in case FIR No. 33 dated 30.7.2015 registered
under Sections 376,366,354-D and 506 IPC at Police Station Ghuman Kalan,
District Gurdaspur, whereby, the application moved by the prosecution
under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning respondents No.2 and 3 as an
additional accused has been dismissed.
(2.) Briefly the facts of the case are that on the basis of complaint made by the petitioner, aforesaid FIR was registered against accused-
Kulwinder Singh and respondents No.2 and 3 but final report under section
173 Cr.P.C. was filed against accused-Kulwinder Singh only and respondents No.2 and 3 were declared innocent and were kept in column
No.2. The charges were framed against Kulwinder Singh only. The statement
of the complainant was recorded before the trial Court and thereafter an
application was moved under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning respondent
No.2 and 3 as an additional accused. The said application was dismissed
by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur vide order dated 4.1.2016, which
is subject matter of challenge in the present petition.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that respondents No.2 and 3 were wrongly declared innocent, whereas, there were specific allegations against them. They were also involved in the commission of
offence as they facilitated the main accused to commit the offence. Not
only their names were mentioned in the FIR but specific role was also
attributed to them in the statement of the complainant recorded before
the trial Court. There was sufficient evidence available on record to
summon respondents No.2 and 3 as an additional accused to face trial.
Learned counsel has also relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Apex
Court in the case of Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab and others 2014(1)
R.C.R.(Criminal) 623 : 2014(1) Recent Apex Judgments (R.A.J.) 384 : 2014
(3) SCC 92, in support of his contentions.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.