INDERJEET @ KAMAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-2016-2-336
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on February 08,2016

Inderjeet @ Kamal Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J. - (1.) CRM-3942-2016 Prayer in this application filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., is for placing on record the charge-sheet (Annexure P-3). After hearing learned counsel for the applicant, the charge-sheet (Annexure P-3) is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Criminal miscellaneous application is disposed of. CRM-M-42522-2015 Prayer in this petition filed under Section 439, Cr.P.C., is for grant of bail to the petitioner, Inderjeet @ Kamal, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 323, 326-B, 354-A and 506, IPC, and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for brevity 'POCSO Act'), in a case arising out of FIR No. 341, dated 16.08.2015, registered at Police Station SGM Nagar, Faridabad.
(2.) At the very outset, learned proxy counsel for the petitioner contends that after presentation of the report under Section 173, Cr.P.C., the charge for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 354-A and 506, IPC, and Section 8 of POCSO Act, were framed by learned Trial Court on 02.12.2015, vide Annexure P-3. He further contends that the maximum sentence which could be awarded under Section 8 of POCSO Act, is five years. The petitioner has already suffered incarceration for approximately five months. He is neither involved nor required in any other case involving the sexual offences. He further contends that the earlier petition filed by the petitioner was withdrawn at that stage vide order, dated 07.12.2015.
(3.) Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the factual aspects raised by learned counsel for the petitioner, however, he submits that the trial is proceeding at a fast speed, therefore, the petitioner might not be released on bail.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.