RAJINDER KAUR Vs. PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERS
LAWS(P&H)-2016-7-186
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on July 11,2016

RAJINDER KAUR Appellant
VERSUS
Punjab State Electricity Board and Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Petitioner-Rajinder Kaur, a retired Lower Division Clerk, was appointed on adhoc basis by Bhakra Beas Management Board (for short 'BBMB') on 27.1.1972 against the share quota of Punjab State Electricity Board (for short 'PSEB'). Later on, PSEB called for the applications from the adhoc employees for regularization of their services. The interview was held on 29.7.1980 and accordingly, the services of the petitioner were regularized with effect from 4.8.1982. She continued to work with BBMB. She was given second time bound pay scale of Rs. 1640-40-2000-2400-60- 2700-2925 with effect from 26.2.1988 with next date of increment as 1.2.1989, vide order dated 26.5.1992 (Annexure-P-12). The petitioner retired from service while working in BBMB on 30.4.2006. At that time, she was drawing the basic pay of Rs. 9,100/-. The retirement order dated 24.3.2006 (Annexure-P-5), issued by the PSEB, shows that she retired from BBMB. Thereafter, while fixing the pension, the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (the successor in interest of PSEB) passed the order dated 28.11.2011 (Annexure-P-19), whereby after seeking the legal opinion, it was stated that the higher time bound pay scale was granted considering the period i.e. 31.1.1972 to 3.8.1982 as regular service whereas the said period was to be considered for pensionary benefits only as per PSCL letter No. 21064/21114 dated 23.1.2001. Consequently, it was ordered that the said period is only to be considered for the pensionary benefits and, therefore, for the purpose of grant of pension only, the pay was reduced to Rs. 8,275/-. Therefore, the PSPCL was of the view that the said time bound pay scale is not to be considered for grant of pension as it was wrongly granted. The petitioner by way of present petition has challenged the said order, stating that her pay could not be reduced for the purpose of pension as done by the respondent-PSEB.
(2.) Respondents No. 1 and 2, in the reply, have taken the stand that the petitioner was working as LDC with effect from 31.1.1972 to 3.8.1982 in BBMB on adhoc basis and subsequently, she worked against the share quota of PSEB in BBMB from 4.8.1982 to 30.4.2006. The second time bound promotion was granted by BBMB on 26.5.1992 and it was mentioned in the said order that this benefit would be admissible to her so long as she remained in BBMB. She was admittedly drawing the basic pay of Rs. 9,100/- at the time of her retirement from BBMB. As far as the second time bound promotion was concerned, the same was granted to her taking into account her adhoc service from 31.1.1972 to 3.8.1982, subject to the condition that her pay will be admissible to her so long as she remains in BBMB. Therefore, this pay is not applicable to her on repatriation to parent department i.e. PSEB. Therefore, her pension has been fixed on her basic I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 (PSEB), the learned counsel for respondents No. 3 and 4 (BBMB) and have also carefully gone through the file.
(3.) Admittedly, at the time of her retirement, the petitioner was getting the basic pay of Rs. 9,100/-. She was getting the second time bound pay scale of Rs. 1640-40-2000-2400-60-2700-2925 in BBMB with effect from 26.2.1988. The order dated 26.5.1992 (Annexure-P-12), passed by the BBMB is reproduced as under :- " The terms of Secretary/Finance, PSEB Patiala Office Order No. 267/FIN/PFC-1988 dated 27.11.1991 as adopted by the BBMB vide Additional Secretary BBMB Chandigarh letter No. 707-807/R-R/130/86/4 dated 6.1.1992 Smt. Rajinder Kaur LDC working in this office is hereby allowed the 2nd time bound scale of Rs. 1640-40-2000-2400-60-2700- 2925 with effect from 26.2.1988 with next date of increment as 1.2.1989. The above benefit of time bound promotional scale after completion of 16 years service in the BBMB will be admissible to her so long as she remain in the Bhakra Beas Management Board as she was initially appointed by the BBMB on 31.1.1972 FN and subsequently appointed by the Punjab State Electricity Board and joined the BBMB on 4.8.1982.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.