JUDGEMENT
DAYA CHAUDHARY,J. -
(1.) The present petition has been filed under
Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case
FIR No.125 dated 14.04.2013 registered under Sections 363-A, 366, 376 and
120-B of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Rama Mandi, District Jalandhar during pendency of the trial.
(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case whereas no offence is made out
against him. The present FIR was registered on the basis of complaint
made by the mother of the victims after a delay of three days which has
not been explained and false and vague allegations have been levelled
against the petitioner. The petitioner was neither named in the FIR nor
in the statement of the complainant got recorded before learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar. The complainant has also stated in
her statement that her daughters came back on their own after a period of
seven days from the date of occurrence. In view of the statement of the
complainant recorded before the trial Court and by considering the factum
of her marriage as well as the number of children out of the said
wedlock, it cannot be presumed in any manner that the victims were minor
at the time of alleged occurrence. The present petitioner has been
implicated only on the basis of the statement made by the victim-Neha who
has earlier named four persons, namely, Munshi, Ramesh, Kamlesh and
Pawan. The coaccused Munshi Lal was earlier exonerated by the
investigating agency in the enquiry and thereafter, the present
petitioner was implicated. The petitioner is in custody since 09.03.2014
and the bail application has been dismissed by the lower Court without
taking into consideration all these facts.
(3.) Learned counsel for respondent-State submits that both the daughters of the complainant were minor at the time of occurrence and both of them
were kidnapped and were taken to far away place i.e. in the State of
Bihar. Both the victims remained under threat and subsequently, when they
were left out by the accused persons. They were recovered by the
investigating agency. As per the statement of the victims recorded under
Section 164 Cr.P.C., it has specifically been mentioned that the accused
persons along with Munshi Lal who is coaccused of the petitioner
threatened them and forcibly made them to sit in a bus. The
prosecutrix-Neha while appearing in the witness-box as PW-2 has also
stated that they were taken to Gonda Bairaj (Bihar) where they were kept
for fifteen days and all the four accused, namely, Munshi, Ramesh,
Kamlesh and Pawan committed rape upon them.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.