BHAG SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-2016-3-137
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on March 03,2016

Bhag Singh and Others Appellant
VERSUS
State Of Haryana And Another Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Cm No. 6828-CII-2014. For the reasons mentioned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 217 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. CM is disposed of. CM No. 6829-CII-2014 and CR No. 2578 of 2014 There is a delay of 558 days in filing the civil revision, the revision is against the order rejecting an application to make a reference to Civil Court passed by the Collector, the order was passed by the Collector on 27.07.2011 and this was brought in challenge through writ petition filed in March 2011 in CWP No. 5787 of 2011. The Government took an objection that the writ petition was not competent and that only the civil revision petition could be filed. The Court dismissed the writ petition on 01.04.2013, the revision has been filed in November 2013. The delay is explained by the party as resulting because of the communication gap between the counsel and the party and the disposal of the writ petition was not immediately notified to the party and hence there was a delay. The explanations are all fragile but since the matter relates to determination of compensation, the State shall have the benefit of the disposal by addressing an issue on merits. I, therefore condone the delay.
(2.) I have no doubt in my mind that the revision is the only appropriate remedy in view of the Punjab State Amendment through Act 2 of 1954 introducing sub Section 3 to Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. As per the said provision, the order made by the Collector, shall be subject to the revision by the High Court. The revision is therefore, competent.
(3.) The counsel points out to me a judgment of this Court, in Lachhman Dass (died) through LRs v. Union of India and another, 2005 139 PunLR 275 that holds that it is beyond the jurisdictional scope of the Land Acquisition Collector, to reject a reference as barred by limitation. The Collector shall at all times make a reference and leave it to the Court to decide on the objection as to the point of limitation for seeking a reference. In terms of the said judgment, I set aside the order passed by the Collector and direct the Collector to make reference to the Civil Court within four weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.