JUDGEMENT
PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL,J. -
(1.) PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL,J. (Oral)
1. Instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 12.09.2014
(Annexure P -5) passed by respondent No.1 -Financial Commissioner and
order dated 19.05.2014 (Annexure P -4) passed by respondent No.2 -
Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar whereby order dated
04.03.2011 (Annexure P -2) passed by respondent No.3 appointing the petitioner Lambardar has been set aside and respondent No.4 has been
appointed as Lambardar.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are to the effect that the petitioner had resigned from the post of Lambardar of village Jaijon Doaba, Tehsil
Garshankar and in order to fill up the said vacancy, applications were
invited from the interested persons by making proclamation in the
village after obtaining necessary sanction from the Collector. In
furtherance of proclamation, five persons including the petitioner and
respondent No.4 submitted their applications. The Collector after
appreciating the comparative merits of the candidates found the
petitioner to be fit for the post of Lambardar and ultimately appointed
him Lambardar vide order dated 04.03.2011 (Annexure P -2). Feeling
aggrieved, respondent No.4 preferred appeal before respondent No.2 -
Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar who set aside the order
dated 04.03.2011 (Annexure P -2) and appointed respondent No.4 as
Lambardar vide impugned order dated 19.05.2014 (Annexure P -4) on the
ground that petitioner, who has now again applied for the post of
Lambardar, had earlier resigned from the post of Lambardar for
contesting the elections for the post of Sarpanch and he was holding the
post of Sarpanch at the time of passing the order dated 04.03.2011
(Annexure P -2) and such a move amounts to negation of law. Against
that, the petitioner preferred revision before respondent No.1 who
dismissed the same vide impugned order dated 12.09.2014 (Annexure P -
5). Hence, this writ petition.
(3.) Upon notice, respondent No.4 filed reply with the averments that earlier the petitioner resigned from the post of Lambardar, therefore,
he cannot hold the same post again. The resignation was for various
reasons mentioned in the application and reference to the same has been
made. The resignation was on the ground that he has to serve his
parents.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.