SUKHWINDER KAUR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
LAWS(P&H)-2016-7-83
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on July 20,2016

SUKHWINDER KAUR Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,J. - (1.) The petitioner is a widow. Her husband Gurcharan Singh, retired from BSF and her minor son Karanvir Singh along with three other persons were killed by the CRPF on account of their mistaken identity. FIR No.16 dated 16.02.1991, under Sections 302/148/149 IPC read with Section 25 of the Arms Act was registered at Police Station Sarhali, District Tarn Taran, which was closed as un -traced on 23.12.1991. The petitioner received ex -gratia grant from the State of Punjab and is also receiving the monthly aid for her survival to the tune of Rs.5,000/ - for the loss of life of her husband and the only minor son. It is alleged that the Civil Administration as well as the then Governor of Punjab assured the petitioner at the time of cremation of her husband and son that the Government would provide job to a member of her family but since the petitioner was left alone, therefore, she adopted Jaskaran Singh, her brother's son, at the time of his birth on 15.07.1991 and thereafter by way of an adoption deed on 29.01.1993. The adopted son has now passed B.Com and the petitioner made an application dated 15.01.2013 to the Deputy Commissioner, Tarn Taran for seeking employment for her adopted son on compassionate ground, which was rejected on 07.02.2013. The petitioner made another application to the Deputy Chief Minister, Punjab at the time of Sangat Darshan, which was forwarded to the Special Chief Secretary (R) and further to the Secretary, Revenue and Rehabilitation and Disaster Management, Punjab, who informed the Deputy Commissioner, Tarn Taran that the employment to the son of the petitioner on compassionate ground cannot be given as Jaskaran Singh is not the adopted son of Gurcharan Singh. The said order dated
(2.) 09.2014 is under challenge in this petition inter alia on the ground that it violates the policy dated 05.02.1996 issued by the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms on the subject of grant of employment in the State Services on compassionate grounds. 2 Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per Clause 5 of the aforesaid policy, for the purpose of offering appointments on Class -III and IV posts on compassionate grounds, the following categories of persons were to be considered: - "(1) (i) A dependent member of the family of a person (bread -winner) killed or 100% physically disabled in terrorist action or by security forces acting in aid of civil power, in the state: (ii) A dependent member of the family of a person (bread -winner), died or 100% physically disabled in riots in India between October 31 or November 7, 1984 (both days inclusive). (iii) A dependent member of the family of an army deserter (bread -winner) killed or 100% physically disabled in 1984 action by the forces against deserters after Operation Blue Star; (iv) To a person (bread -winner), who helped the Civil Administration in fight, against terrorism and has suffered great loss/misery and is on the hit -list of the terrorist or to a dependent son or daughter of such a persons (bread -winner). (Under this category, compassionate appointments will be made in Police Force only). (No.11/64/92 -2PP1/10055, dated 7th July, 1992/14th August, 1992). 2nd (No.11/64/92 -2PP1/19989, dated December, 1992). (2) A dependent member of the family of the deceased Government employee, or of a Government employee, who is retired from service on medical grounds before attaining the age of 55 years in the case of Class -III employees and before attaining the age of 57 years in the case of Class -IV employee. (3) Regular Government employees declared surplus on account of abolition of post(s) Department(s) of the State Government for any reason, including reduction of post(s) etc. (No.11/15/92 -2PP1/5376, dated 13th March, 1995). (4) Disabled Ex -servicemen (not unfit for Civil Service). (5) A dependent member of the family of the Defence Service Personnel: - (i) Killed in service, while performing duties; or (ii) Who are severely disabled and totally unfit for re - employment. (6) Physically handicapped persons."
(3.) It is further submitted that while making appointment against Class -III and Class -IV posts on compassionate ground out of the categories of the persons mentioned here -in -above, the following conditions/ clarifications were to be meticulously followed: - "(i) For appointment on compassionate grounds, only a widow or a dependent son or dependent unmarried daughter or adopted dependent son or adopted unmarried daughter of the deceased,may be considered. This is in line with the policy of Government of India contained in their letter No.14014/20/94 -Estt. (D), dated 9th December, 1993 (Copy enclosed at Annexure -II)." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.