JUDGEMENT
HARI PAL VERMA,J. -
(1.) The petitioner has filed the present petition under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking setting aside the order dated 4.6.2015
(Annexure P-3) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mewat,
whereby the summoning order dated 2.12.2013 (Annexure P-1) passed by
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nuh has been set aside.
(2.) The petitioner-complainant has filed the criminal complaint under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC, against the respondent. The Magistrate
sought report under Section 202 Cr.P.C. from the police and thereafter,
respondents were summoned for the offence under the aforesaid sections
vide order dated 2.12.2013 (Annexure P-1). However, the order of
summoning dated 2.12.2013 passed by learned Magistrate was challenged by
way of revision petition and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mewat
vide judgment dated 4.6.2015 (Annexure P-3) allowed the revision petition
filed by the respondents-accused and set aside the order of summoning
dated 2.12.2013.
(3.) Briefly stated that Wasim Akram aged about 18 years is son of the petitioner and he is neighbourer of the respondents namely Sahina, Ismail
and Rajman. The petitioner being neighbour of the accused reposed his
faith in them and advanced L 21,000/- to the accused persons on the
occasion of engagement of son Wasim Akram. The respondents raised demand
of garments, jewelary and other articles for incurring the expenses in
the engagement of his son just to commit cheating upon the
petitioner-complainant. The complainant made arrangement of ten couple
garments, 2-1/2 tolas golden ornaments and silver ornaments and other
articles. After few days, the respondents-accused along with other
accused came to the house of complainant and raised demand of L
1,00,000/- for purchasing land. Taking into consideration the new relation, the complainant gave L 1,00,000/- to the accused party. When
the complainant asked the accused for solemnization of marriage of his
son, the accused found reluctant but after some time it came to the
notice of the petitioner-complainant that marriage of Sabnam has been
solemnized with another person. On raising demand of returning back all
the jewellery items and other articles, the accused refused to return the
same. It is in the aforesaid facts, the criminal complaint was filed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.