STATE OF HARYANA Vs. MADAN
LAWS(P&H)-2006-3-582
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on March 29,2006

STATE OF HARYANA Appellant
VERSUS
MADAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

RAJIVE BHALLA,J - (1.) THE Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhajjar, vide reference dated 14.6.2005, made under Section 395 of the Cr.P.C., has referred the following question to the High Court:- "Whether the Environmental Court at Faridabad or whether the Environmental Court at Hisar or Ilaqa Magistrate, District Jhajjar is competent to try the cases, committed within the jurisdiction of District Jhajjar, under the Act ?"
(2.) A brief narrative of the facts that have led the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhajjar to make a reference to this Court, would be appropriate. FIR No. 191, dated 5.6.2005, under Sections 9, 39 and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 was registered at Police Station Jhajjar. One of the accused, namely, Shashi Singh filed an application, dated 7.6.2005, for grant of anticipatory bail. Vide order dated 9.6.2005, the Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar dismissed the application, holding therein that powers to deal with matters, under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (for short herein after referred to as "the Wild Life Act"), had been conferred upon a Special Court at Faridabad, by virtue of Notification No. SO16/CA2/1974/S.14/97, dated 6.2.1997. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhajjar, before whom some of the accused were produced, while in custody, after considering the aforementioned order, and while accepting their bail bonds and granting bail to them, framed the question, reproduced herein above and forwarded a reference to this Court. The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 was enacted to provide protection to wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto. Section 51 of the Act provides penalties/punishments to be imposed for the commission of any offence. The State of Haryana, pursuant to exercise of powers, under Section 11(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short referred to as "the Code"), and after consultation with the High Court, issued a notification, dated 6.2.1997, establishing two special Courts of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, one each at Faridabad and Hisar, to try and inquire into cases, arising within the territories of the State of Haryana, under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The notification sets out the local jurisdiction of these Courts. The Judicial Magistrate at Faridabad was conferred with jurisdiction to try and inquire into offences, arising within the limits of Districts Faridabad, Gurgaon, Mohindergarh, Rewari, Jind, Bhiwani and Rohtak, whereas the Judicial Magistrate at Hisar was conferred with jurisdiction to try and inquire into offences, arising within the jurisdiction of the remaining Districts i.e. Ambala, Panchkula, Kurukshetra, Kaithal, Karnal, Hisar, Sirsa, Panipat, Sonipat and Yamuna Nagar.
(3.) DISTRICT Jhajjar was carved out from the territories of District Rohtak, pursuant to a notification dated 25.6.1997, issued under Section 5 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887. The notification dated 6.2.1997, pursuant whereto powers to try and inquire into cases, under the Act, were conferred upon Judicial Magistrates First Class of Faridabad and Hisar, was not amended to include the newly carved out District Jhajjar. A subsequent amendment of the aforementioned notification, dated 11.11.2004, whereby the provisions of the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900, were added to the notification dated 6.2.1997, did not include District Jhajjar in the notification dated 6.2.1997, for the purpose of inquiry or trial into offences committed, under the provisions of the Wild Life Act.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.