MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABAD Vs. RAJ BALA
LAWS(P&H)-2006-4-125
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on April 25,2006

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABAD Appellant
VERSUS
RAJ BALA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Surya Kant, J. - (1.) APPREHENDING the demolition of a part of the suit property by the Municipal Corporation, Faridabad on the ground that the construction thereof was raised unauthorizedly and without getting the site-plan sanctioned, the respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for injunction along with an application for ad-interim injunction. The learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Faridabad, however, dismissed the application for adinterim injunction. The respondent preferred an appeal, which, the learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad vide his impugned order dated May 19, 2004, and after observing that the respondent-plaintiff is admittedly in possession of the suit property since the year 1965, has allowed to the extent that both the parties have been directed to maintain status quo with regard to existing state of affairs during the pendency of the suit.
(2.) IT appears that the main issue which requires adjudication is as to whether the existing structure an unauthorized construction, having been constructed in the year 2001 or is in existence since the year 1965-66. Since the first appellate court has directed both the parties to maintain status quo and the scope of interference in such like cases is quite limited, this revision petition is disposed of with the following directions:- (i)the learned civil court shall expedite the adjudication of the suit and make an endeavour to conclude the same within six months; (ii) a specific finding shall be returned by it as to whether the disputed premises was constructed in the year 1965-66 or in the year 2001; (iii) if it is found that the premises was constructed recently and in gross violation of the municipal laws, the civil court shall have to keep in view that no one can be allowed to thrive on his own illegal acts; in such an event, the plaintiffrespondent shall have to bear exemplary costs; (iv) the civil court, however, shall not be influenced by any tentative observations made herein-above and shall decide the case in accordance with law. Disposed of.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.