JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Notice of motion. Mr.Harish Rathee,Sr. D.A.G. Hayrana, who
is present in court accepts notice. With the consent of learned
counsel for
the parties, the matter has been heard on merits.
(2.) The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of
the Constitution for quashing order dated 11.9.2005 (Annexure P-1)
whereby they have been transferred from Gurgaon range to other
ranges
whereas they belong to the Gurgaon range. The matter is squarely
covered
by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Vinod
Kumari
and others vs. The State of Haryana and others (CWP No. 66 of 2006
decided on 4.4.2006) where, in such like cases, comprehensive
directions
have been issued.
(3.) In view of the above, we allow this writ petition in terms of the
Division Bench judgment of this Court in Vinod Kumari and others (Supra).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.