JUDGEMENT
HEMANT GUPTA, J. -
(1.) The petitioner is aggrieved against the order passed by the
learned Executing Court on 16/8/2005 whereby the learned
Executing
Court has framed issued on the objections raised by the petitioner.
(2.) It is contended by the petitioner that objections filed by
Kuldeep Singh lack bona fide inasmuch as he appeared as a witness
of the
tenant and now after decree was passed, he has asserting right in
himself.
Prima facie, the argument advanced by learned counsel for the
petitioner
seems to be meritorious. But since the learned Executing Court has
framed
issues and has ordered that only three opportunities shall be given to
each
party to lead their evidence, I deem it appropriate to direct the learned
Executing Court to decide the objections on or before 31.05.2006.
(3.) The learned Executing Court shall adhere to its schedule.
With the above-said directions, the revision petition stands
disposed of.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.