JUDGEMENT
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. -
(1.) This order shall dispose off Crl. Misc.No. 53978-M of 2002
and Crl. Misc. No. 3547-M of 2003 as in both these petitions the
quashing
of FIR No. 175 dated 29.7.2002 under Section 420 and 120-B IPC
registered at Police Station City Hoshiarpur has been prayed for.
As per the allegations in the FIR (Annexure P-1) one Ashok
Kumar opened an account in the State Bank of India at Hoshiarpur.
He
deposited a bank draft dated 7.7.2000 issued by the State Bank of
India
South Hall,, Middlesex, London, which has been drawn on the State
Bank
of India Faridabad in his account. The proceeds of the said draft to
the tune
of Rs.5,67,600/- were credited to the account of Ashok Kumar out of
which
he withdrew Rs.67,000/- and transferred the balance amount to the
account
of the petitioner-Gurdial Singh. The petitioner also got a draft
prepared for
Rs.4,00,000/- from his account and withdrew the balance amount.
(2.) Subsequently, respondent Nos. 3 and 4, namely, Anil Kumar
and Mrs. Shanta Kumar resident of 340 Wellinster Road, Hounslow-
SJBEngland
informed the bank that the draft in question belonged to their father
whose name is also Ashok Kumar. Accordingly, an inquiry was
conducted
by the officials of the bank and Ashok Kumar admitted that the draft in
question did not belong to him and was given to him by the petitioner.
Ashok Kumar returned the entire amount to the petitioner who has
further
remitted the entire amount of Rs.5,67,600/- to the original
complainant i.e.
Anil Kumar and Mrs. Shanta Kumar of England and also the State
Bank of
India, Hoshiarpur.
(3.) Counsel for the petitioner contends that as the entire amount in
question has already been paid by him not only to the original
complainant
i.e. Anil Kumar and Mrs. Shanta Kumar but has also paid an equal
amount
to the bank also, hence, the petitioner is not liable to be prosecuted
any
further in the present case.
Mr. Parveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits
that not only has the petitioner paid the entire amount to the original
complainant as well as to the bank but he is also ready and willing to
pay
the interest as accrued on the entire amount at the prevalent bank
rate.
Respondent No.3-Anil Kumar who is the original complainant
has also written to the Assistant General Manager, State Bank of
India,
Hoshiarpur, stating that as he and respondent No.4 have received the
amount of Rs.5,67,600/-, therefore, they do not wish to take any
action
against the petitioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.