JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) C.M. No.3658-CII of 2006
This application is for restoration of the appeal, which was
dismissed for non-prosecution on 14.2.2006. Application is
accompanied
by an affidavit.
(2.) In view of averments made in this application, it is allowed and
order dated 14.2.2006 stands recalled. Appeal is restored to its
original number.
On request, appeal is taken up on Board for hearing.
(3.) This appeal has been filed against order dated 3.8.2005 vide
which application of the appellant to get custody of the minor children
was dismissed.
Court below has given a categoric finding that at this stage, to
remove the children from the custody of their mother, shall not be
conducive for their development. It has also come on record that the
children are residing with the mother since 1998. Application to get
their
custody was filed in the month of March, 2003. There is no evidence
on
record, to show that during long period of 5 years between 1998 to
2003,
any attempt was made by the appellant to look after the children by
sending
some amount or further that he made any attempt during this period
to meet
the children/ to get their custody. Mother is well-off and she is getting
income, which is sufficient to maintain both the children. Finding to
that
extent, given by the Court below, is perfectly justified. No case is
made out
to interfere in pure findings of fact given by the Court below.
Dismissed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.