JUDGEMENT
HEMANT GUPTA, J. -
(1.) The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order
dated 24/7/2004, 9/8/2004 and 25/8/2004 passed by the learned
Executing
Court arising out of the decree in a suit for specific performance of
agreement dated 5/6/1991.
(2.) The plaintiff-respondents have filed a suit for possession by
way of specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 5.6.1991
in
respect of seven plots measuring 48 Kanals 2 Marlas. The said land
was
agreed to be sold at the rate of Rs.75,000.00 per acre. A sum of
Rs.70,000.00
was paid as earnest money. A sum of Rs.10,000.00 was kept with the
prospective vendee on account of mortgage amount payable to one
Amar
Nath. It was also mentioned in the agreement that the vendor has
liability
towards Punjab and Sind Bank and towards Haryana Khadi Board.
(3.) The
amount due to the Punjab and Sind Bank was agreed to be paid by
the
prospective vendee. It was also stipulated in the agreement that the
balance
amount i.e., after adjusting Rs.70,000/- and the amount of the loan
mentioned above, would be paid to the vendor at the time of
execution of
sale deed. The last date for execution of sale deed was fixed as
31/10/1992.
It is the case of the plaintiffs that a sum of Rs.2,16,000/- was
paid on different dates including the amount of earnest money before
the
stipulated date of execution of sale deed. Since the sale deed was
not
executed on the stipulated date, a suit for specific performance of
agreement
of sale was filed on 18.11.1992. The said suit was decreed on
26.08.1998 on
the condition of payment of Rs.1,61,733.70 as the balance amount
payable
to the defendant-petitioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.