JUDGEMENT
Viney Mittal, J. -
(1.) This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petitions No.14213 and
14224 of 2005 as common questions of facts and law are involved in the
same. For the sake of convenience, the facts are borrowed from Civil Writ
Petition No.14213 of 2005.
(2.) The grievance made by the petitioner-Company is that
although the plot in question bearing No.82, Sector 44, Urban Estate,
Gurgaon was allotted to it vide allotment letter dated August 2,2004 but the
Estate Officer, HUDA, Gurgaon has refused to accept the payment towards
second instalment of the plot in question. A further prayer has been made
for issuance of a direction to the respondents to hand over the actual
physical possession of the plot in question to the petitioner.
Notice of motion was issued in this case on September 8,2005
but no written statement has been filed on behalf of respondents No.2 and
(3.) so far.
3. In view of the aforesaid facts, we dispose of the present
petition with a direction to the Estate Officer,Haryana Urban Development
Authority, Gurgaon to consider the claim made by the petitioner-Company.
For this purpose, the petitioner shall file a detail and comprehensive
representation within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy
of this order is received. Along with the aforesaid representation, the
petitioner shall also append all the requisite documents. On receipt of the
aforesaid representation, Estate Officer, HUDA, respondent No.3, shall
pass a detailed speaking order within a period of four months from the date
of filing of the aforesaid representation.
Till the matter is finally decided by the Estate Officer, HUDA,
Gurgaon, the interim order dated September 8,2005 shall continue to
operate till further orders.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.