JUDGEMENT
HEMANT GUPTA, J. -
(1.) The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order
passed by the learned Rent Controller dated 13.9.2005, whereby the
landlord was permitted to amend the plaint so as to correct the description
of the tenanted premised.
(2.) The land lord Surinder Kumar sought ejectment of the tenant
being specific landlord, under Section 13-A of the East Punjab Urban Rent
Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The tenanted
premises was described in the site plan in red colour as consisting of one
room. The tenant filed written statement and took a stand in the written
statement that he is in occupation of two rooms and a kitchen as shown
yellow in the site plan. Though the landlord adduced the evidence to prove
that tenanted premises are the one which are shown red in the site plan, but
by virtue of amendment sought on 29.8.2005, it was pointed out that due to
inadvertence the premises could not be described correctly and landlord
wants to rectify the mistake. It is pointed out that respondent has also filed
site plan Exhibit R-4 and, therefore, the petitioner be permitted to amend the
plaint. The said application has been allowed by the learned Rent
Controller.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that
the petitioner has sought ejectment as a specific landlord. Such right can be
availed by the landlord only within one year of his retirement. Since the
petitioner retired on 31.3.1996, therefore, the amendment sought by the
petitioner vide application dated 29.8.2005 is beyond the period of
limitation during which the land lord was entitled to seek eviction in
summary manner. It was also pointed out that the landlord insisted that the
tenanted premises as shown red in the site plan not only in the plaint, but in
the rejoinder as well in evidence. Therefore, the amendment sought is
malafide and against the evidence already led by the landlord. It is further
argued that the amendment allowed at the stage in fact is to avoid perjury
and also lead to de-novo trial.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.