JUDGEMENT
J.S. Khehar,J. -
(1.) The petitioner was holding the post of Compressor Driver Grade
III in the scale of Rs.260-400 (unrevised). Promotion from the post of
Compressor Driver Grade III is to the post of Compressor Driver
Grade II, in
the scale of Rs.1200-1800 (revised). The petitioner alleges that he
qualified
the trade test prescribed for acquiring eligibility for promotion to the
post of
Compressor Driver Grade II, and thereupon, was actually promoted
to the
post of Compressor Driver Grade II on 26.4.1988.
(2.) The post of Compressor Driver Grade II was upgraded to the
post of Compressor Driver Grade I with effect from 1.3.1993, as a
consequence of restructuring of Groups C and D cadres in terms of
the
circular letter dated 27.1.1993 issued by the Railway Board
(Annexure P7).
(3.) petitioner's upgradation from the post of Compressor Driver
Grade II to the post of Compressor Driver Grade I, was impugned by
respondent No.6, by filing OA No.1218/Pb. Of 1995, before the
Central
Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh. In his claim
respondent No.6 asserted, that he was senior to the petitioner as
Compressor
Driver Grade II, and as such, should have on restructuring of the
Group 'C'
cadre, been granted redesignation as Compressor Driver Grade I, as
a mater
of superiority over the petitioner. It was the case of respondent No.6
before
the Central Administrative Tribunal, that the petitioner had been
granted
redesignation as Compressor Driver Grade I, over respondent No.6
by way of
reservation, as he belongs to Scheduled Caste category, whereas
respondent
No.6 was a member of the general category.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.