JUDGEMENT
M.M.KUMAR, J. -
(1.) Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana, who is
present in the Court accepts notice.
With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties the writ
petition has been heard. The prayer made in the petition is for
issuance of a
writ of certiorari quashing the condition that the Dearness Allowance
be
treated as Dearness Pay for the purposes of Retirement
Gratuity/Death
Gratuity under the relevant instructions dated 8.3.1996 (P-1). The
matter is
not res integra as this Court has already opined in favour of the
petitioners
in the judgments dated 23.9.2005 (P-2) and 20.12.2005 (P-4). The
petitioners have already stake their claims by sending an advance
notice on
19.2.2006 (P-3), which is pending consideration of the respondents
and no
decision on the same has so far been taken.
(2.) In view of above, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the
respondents to take cognizance of the legal notice sent by the
petitioners
and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of four
months
from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. If the
claim
of the petitioners is found to be meritorious and decided in their
favour then
the benefit accruing to the petitioners shall be disbursed within a
further
period of four months thereafter. It shall be appreciated if the
judgments of
this Court dated 23.9.2005 (P-2) and 20.12.2005 (P-4) are kept in
view and
a speaking order is passed.
(3.) Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.