GHUDHU RAM Vs. GURJANT SINGH
LAWS(P&H)-2006-3-171
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on March 16,2006

GHUDHU RAM Appellant
VERSUS
GURJANT SINGH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Vide order under challenge, evidence of the petitioner/claimant was closed. Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner needs only one opportunity to complete the evidence and if he is not allowed to do so his claim application is likely to be dismissed. It has further been stated that due to some communication gap with the counsel, he failed to produce the witness in Court. It has further been stated that the petitioner needs only one opportunity to conclude his evidence.
(2.) This Court feels that present is a case where one more opportunity can be granted to the petitioner. Rules and Procedure are handmaid of justice to enhance the same and not to subvert it. Their Lordships of Supreme Court in Sardar Amarjit Singh Kalra (dead) by L.Rs And others vs. Parmod Gupta (Smt.) (dead) by L.Rs. And others (2003) 3 S.C.C. 272, in para 26 of the judgment had opined as under:- "Laws of procedure are meant to regulate effectively,assist and aid the object of doing substantial and real justice and not to foreclose even an adjudication merits of substantial rights of citizen under personal. property and other laws. Procedure has always been viewed as the handmaid of justice and not meant to hamper the cause of justice or sanctify miscarriage of justice."
(3.) In view of the judgment referred to above and facts of this case, this revision petition is allowed and order under challenge is set aside.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.