JUDGEMENT
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL -
(1.) According to the FIR, which has been lodged by Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Kaithal, in a file pertaining to an enquiry on a complaint
filed by
one Jai Veer against Suraj Bhan, Judgment Writer, which was in
custody of
petitioner Ram Purshotam, Clerk of the Court, a letter dated
9.12.2005 was
missing. The said letter was quite material for the enquiry and the
same
appeared to have been stolen or destroyed by some mischievous
person.
(2.) Since the file was in custody of the petitioner, he is sought to be
arrested on the allegation of theft.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that at best, an adverse
inference can be drawn against the petitioner for the missing letter in
a departmental enquiry, but arrest of the petitioner on this charge is not
called
for; he will join investigation and face proceedings in accordance with
law.
(3.) Without expressing any final opinion on merits, the petitioner is
granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or three
months
whichever is later during which the petitioner will be free to apply for
regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.