JUDGEMENT
Viney Mittal,J. -
(1.) Learned counsel for the petitioners informs that petitioners
No.3,4 and 5 have already deposited the entire outstanding dues
against
them but they have not been issued 'No Objection Certificate' by the
Estate
Officer,respondent No.3. Learned counsel further states that
petitioners
No.1,2 and 6 have not deposited any amount and are not so required
to
deposit the same in view of the law down by in Civil Writ Petition
No.13648 of 1998 decided on May 4,1999 ( Tahal Singh and others
V. State
of Punjab and others) and other connected matters.
(2.) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we direct
Chief Administrator, Punjab Urban Planning and Development
Authority,respondent No.2 to reconsider the claim of the petitioners in
the
light of the judgment in Tahal Singh's case (supra) and take a final
decision
thereupon. The petitioner shall file a detailed representation before
the
Chief Administrtor, PUDA within a period of four weeks from the day
a
certified copy of this order is received. On receipt of the aforesaid
representation, the Chief Administrator shall reconsider the claim of
the
petitioners in the light of the judgment in Tahal Singh's case (supra)
within
a period of four months thereafter by passing a detailed speaking
order.
(3.) Necessary follow up action thereafter shall also be taken by the Chief
Administrator.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.