ARPANA NAGPAL Vs. UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH
LAWS(P&H)-2006-7-212
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on July 17,2006

ARPANA NAGPAL Appellant
VERSUS
UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) COUNSEL for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was a salaried employee of Centre for Management Research and Development, a company registered under the Companies Act. The main accused Mr.Joseph Elderidge, the Managing Director and C.E.O. of the Company has been arrested and is behind bars. No specific role has been attributed to the petitioner, apart from the fact that she performed her duties as an employee. Notice of motion to the standing counsel for Union Territory, Chandigarh, for 8.9.2006.
(2.) MEANWHILE, in the event of arrest of the petitioner, she shall be released on interim anticipatory bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction, subject to the following conditions :- i)that she shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required ; ii)that she shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii)that she shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.