PURAN CHAND SARDANA Vs. PATIALA DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNIONS LTD
LAWS(P&H)-2006-10-115
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on October 16,2006

PURAN CHAND SARDANA Appellant
VERSUS
PATIALA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNIONS LTD. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Vinod K.Sharma, J. - (1.) Present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 18.3.2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala dismissing the application moved by the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the Code) for impleading new parties on the plea that those were inadvertently left out.
(2.) Learned Trial Court rejected the application on the plea that the plaintiff had failed to show as to how the said parties were necessary or proper parties to the suit. It was further held that impleading of those parties would amount to reopening of the case as those parties will have to file written statement to the claim made by the petitioner.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contends that the Punjab State Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Limited, Chandigarh being an appointing authority was a necessary party to the claim made by the petitioner and therefore, the Court was wrong in rejecting the application moved by the petitioner. In support of her contention learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on Satwant Kaur Vs. Gurmail Singh and others 1999 (1) Civil Court Cases 16. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that by way of amendment the petitioner is seeking amendment in the nature of ministerial act as defendants are being added who would have only to file the written statement and therefore, there was no question of fresh trial as held by the learned lower court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.