JUDGEMENT
MAHESH GROVER, J. -
(1.) On 15/2/2002 the State of Punjab issued a notification
under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter
referred to as 'the Act'). The said acquisition was for a public
purpose, namely for setting up of Ganesha Project of M/s
International Tractors Limited. The notification was published in the
newspapers on 9/2/2002. Objections were invited from the interested
persons and the petitioners submitted their objections which are on record.
(2.) The petitioners were heard and thereafter on 28.2.2003 the
State issued a notification under Section 6 of the Act. The petitioners
in all these writ petitions have challenged these notifications
primarily on the ground that the State had resorted to the acquisition
under the provisions of Part VII of the Act and that this was not an
acquisition which was covered by Part II of the Act. The acquisition
was being made for a company which was interested in profiteering
and there was no public purpose involved. Further it was stated that
the acquisition was totally against the provisions of Part VII of the
Act and, therefore, the acquisition deserves to be quashed.
Having broadly set out the contours of the factual aspects
of the case and the legal challenges made by the petitioners to the
action of the State, we now propose to go into the matter in detail and
deal with the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
petitioners.
(3.) The first and foremost submission made by the learned
counsel for the petitioners is that the acquisition is for a company and
not in pursuance to any public purpose, hence the present acquisition
is one which has been made under the provisions of Part VII of the
Land Acquisition Act and not under the provisions of Part II and
since the acquisition is under Part VII, the procedure as envisaged
therein ought to have been followed and any violation of the
provisions contained in Part VII would result in the entire acquisition
proceedings being vitiated.
Building up his case on this premise he went on to say that
the impugned notification is vague, inasmuch as it does not define the
purpose of acquisition clearly and therefore, this has prejudiced the
rights of the petitioners.
Further, the provisions of Sections 38 to 44 have to be read
in conjunction with each other and violation of any part of these
provisions would render the entire acquisition void. Sections 38, 40,
41, 42 and 44-B are extracted herein as the entire submissions of the
learned counsel for the petitioners centre around these provisions :-
"38. Omitted by Act 68 of 1984, (Secton 21
w.e.f.24.09.1984).
40.Previous enquiry :-
(1) Such consent shall not be given unless the
appropriate Government be satisfied, either on
the report of the Collector under Section 5-A,
sub-section (2) or by an enquiry held as
hereinafter provided :-
(a) That the purpose of the acquisition is to
obtain land for the erection of dwelling house for
workmen employed by the company or for the
provisions of amenities directly connected
therewith; or
(aa) That such acquisition is needed for the
construction of some building or work for a
company which is engaged or is taking steps for
engaging itself in any industry or work which is
for public purpose; or
(b) That such acquisition is needed for the
construction of some work, and that such work is
likely to prove useful to the public.
(2) Such enquiry shall be held by such an officer at
such time and place as the appropriate Government
shall appoint.
(3)Such officer may summon and enforce the
attendance of witnesses and compel the production
of documents by the same means and, as far as
possible, in the same manner as is provided by the
Code of civil Procedure, 1908 in the case of a Civil
Court.
41. Agreement with appropriate Government If the
appropriate Government is satisfied after considering the
report, if any, of the Collector under Section 5-A, subsection
(2), or on the report of the officer making an inquiry
under Section 40 that the proposed acquisition is for any of
the purposes referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) or
clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 40, it shall require
the company to enter into an agreement with the
appropriate Government, providing to the satisfaction of
the appropriate Government for the following matters,
namely :
(1) The payment of the appropriate Government of
the cost of the acquisition;
(2) The transfer, on such payment of the land to the
company;
(3) The terms on which the land shall be held by the
company;
(4) Where the acquisition is for the purpose of
erecting dwelling houses or the provision of
amenities connected therewith, the time within
which, the conditions on which and the manner in
which the dwelling houses or amenities shall be
erected or provided;
(4-A) Where the acquisition is for the construction
of any building or work for a company which is
engaged or is taking steps for engaging itself in any
industry or work which is for a public purpose the
time within which, and the conditions on which, the
building or work shall be constructed or executed;
and
(5) Where the acquisition is for the construction of
any other work, the time within which and the
conditions on which the work shall be executed and
maintained, and the terms on which the public shall
be entitled to use the work.
42. Publication of agreement Every such agreement shall,
as soon as may be after its execution, be published in the
official Gazette, and shall thereupon (so far as regards the
terms on which the public shall be entitled to use the work)
have the same effect as if it had formed part of this act.
44-B. Land no to be acquired under this part except for
certain purpose for private companies other than
government companies Notwithstanding anything
contained in this Act, no land shall be acquired under this
part, except for the purpose mentioned in clause (a) of subsection
(1) of Section 40, for a private company which is
not a Government company.
Explanation - "Private Company" and "Government
Company" shall have the meanings respectively assigned to
them in the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.