H.S.BEDI,J - (1.) SUMMONS with regard to Harminder Singh have been received back with the report that he has refused to accept service on the ground that his mother was not well and that he would not be able to appear in Court on account of this fact. It is, therefore, apparent that the respondent has been served.
(2.) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Respondent No.2 Harminder Singh Banga is an accused in F.I.R. No.69 dated March 10, 1994 for offences under Sections 302/336/505/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station, Division No. 6, Ludhiana. In the incident in question he is said to have shot dead one Gurpreet Singh with a .12 bore gun. He moved an application for bail before the Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, who vide his order dated May 15, 1994, Annexure P1, dismissed the same holding that the accused was not entitled to bail as he had caused the bullet injuries to the deceased. The accused, thereafter moved another bail application praying that his mother was seriously ill and he was required to be available to attend to her. In support of the application he appended Annexures-P2 dated July 14, 1994, a certificate issued by 'Kapoor Memorial Hospital' in which it was stated that Mrs.Harbans Kaur mother of the accused was admitted in the hospital and was suffering from High Blood Pressure and also diabetes with Ischomeic heart disease and that she was in a serious condition. After hearing the counsel for the parties and despite the objections having been raised by the prosecution, the petitioner was allowed interim bail on the very next day i.e. July 15, 1994 with a direction to surrender in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana on August 1, 1994. Aggrieved by this order, the complainant has come to this Court in the present proceedings.
(3.) ON July 22, 1994, notices were issued to the respondents for August 3, 1994 and though the Advocate General, Punjab was served, the accused could not be served. On August 3, 1994 dasti notices were ordered to be served to respondent No.2 and direction to that effect was also issued to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana. As already mentioned above, notices have been served in the manner indicated.;