JUDGEMENT
R.P.NAGRATH, J. -
(1.) THE petitioner has filed the instant revision to challenge the concurrent findings of conviction recorded by both the Courts
below under Section 498 -A IPC. He faced trial for offences under
Sections 406 and 498 -A of Indian Penal Code (IPC) alongwith his
parents. Parents of the petitioner were acquitted. The petitioner
was also acquitted under Section 406 IPC. The petitioner has
been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
one year and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/ -, in default to further undergo
simple imprisonment for one month under Section 498 -A IPC.
(2.) AS per custody certificate placed on record by the State counsel, the petitioner has by now undergone about three months
of imprisonment.
The complainant had challenged the acquittal of parents of petitioner and the acquittal of petitioner under Section
406 IPC but the appeal filed by the complainant was also dismissed by a common judgment of the appellate Court. The
story of prosecution is narrated in Ex. P -2, the complaint dated
15.02.2010 made by wife of petitioner to the police.
(3.) IN response to the matrimonial advertisement published in 'The Tribune' newspaper, the petitioner and his parents came to
Kurukshetra on 09.03.2008. The marriage proposal was finalized
and Roka ceremony was held on 09.03.2008 itself. The petitioner
proclaimed that they are from good family and have no greed for
dowry. They only wanted a decent marriage to be performed. The
marriage was solemnized on 22.11.2008 at Town Marriage Palace,
Kurukshetra. Certain gold items and cash etc. were given to the
petitioner and his parents. An amount of Rs. 7,75,000/ - was spent in
the marriage. It was also stated that a sum of Rs. 50,000/ - was given
in cash for purchasing a motorcycle for the petitioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.