SAWINDER KAUR Vs. ANGREJ SINGH AND OTHERS
LAWS(P&H)-2014-9-577
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on September 26,2014

Sawinder Kaur Appellant
VERSUS
Angrej Singh and Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) CRM No. 2703 of 2014 For the reason set out in the application, the application for condonation of delay of 67 days is allowed. CRM No. 2704 of 2014 The applicant is permitted to place on record Annexures P-1 to P-4. The application is allowed. Criminal Misc. A-124-MA of 2014 1. The application is filed under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying for grant of leave to appeal against the order of dismissal of private complaint filed by the complainant. It is the case of the complainant that the accused committed fraud and forged Will dated 12.5.2000 as though it was executed by her mother Jaswant Kaur @ Jasso @ Gurmej Kaur in order to get wrongful gain.
(2.) On the side of the complainant the complainant was examined as CW1. The standard thumb impression of Gurmej Kaur found in the account opening form with Punjab Gramin Bank, Manawala was produced and spoken to by CW2 Dharminder Kumar, Clerk attached to the said Bank. CW3 Ms. Sukhpreet Kaur is a hand writing expert who spoke about the result of the comparison she made with the standard thumb impression found in the account opening form with the disputed thumb impression found on the subject Will Ex. C1.
(3.) The trial Court having thoroughly analysed the evidence on record came to the conclusion that the evidence of the expert witness completely demolishes the version of the complainant. Having concluded that prima facie case was not made out, the trial Court chose to dismiss the complaint.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.