JUDGEMENT
S.P.BANGARH, J. -
(1.) MARRIAGE between the parties was solemnised on
16.11.1993, according to Hindu Religious Rites, at Amritsar. It was a simple marriage and no articles of dowry were given
to the appellant or his family members. After the marriage,
parties cohabited together at Kapurthala, where the
appellant has been serving in Rail Coach Factory. After his
appointment in Rail Coach Factory in 1987, the appellant
was allotted a railway quarter in Rail Coach Factory vide
allotment order No. 23 -W/Allotment dated 08.11.1998. The
respondent wanted the appellant to shift to Amritsar,
whereto, the latter did not accede, because of being on
permanent job and it would have been difficult for him to
undertake journey everyday to attend his duty from Amritsar
to Kapurthala.
(2.) APPELLANT being financially affluent than the respondent, the latter could not compel the former to
choose the place of residence as per her wish. The
respondent was posted as Mistress in Sri Guru Harikishan
Public School at Amritsar and was drawing salary less than
the appellant. She accepted this job against the wishes and
without the consent of the appellant, in order to satisfy her
ego and vanity, with an intention to cause mental agony and
harassment to the appellant. On 21.04.1994, the father of
the respondent wrote a letter to the father of the appellant
requesting him to send the respondent to Amritsar, as her
brother Anil Sahejpal was coming to Amritsar on short leave
from Hyderabad on 01.05.1994. The respondent was sent to
Amritsar on 30.04.1994 with full preparation to stay there
for a month at the request of her father, but the respondent
did not return to Kapurthala to join the company of the
appellant albeit his repeated visits to Amritsar in the months
of August 1994, September 1994 and October 1994. The
father of the appellant sent postal money order for 'Karwa
Chauth' to the respondent that was duly received by her at
Amritsar, but neither she nor her parents responded. The
respondent refused to join the company of the appellant.
This informal behaviour of the respondent had
shaken the mental equilibrium of the appellant, as the
behaviour of the former was sufficient to cause mental
agony to the latter. She, thus, deserted the company of the
appellant for incessant period of more than two years,
without any sufficient and reasonable cause. No
cohabitation resumed between the parties albeit best efforts
made by the appellant and through the intervention of the
Panchayat uptill January, 1995. Thereafter, the respondent
lodged an FIR against the appellant and his family members
including his father, mother and unmarried sister and they
were arrested by the police on 13.05.1995. The respondent
also filed a petition for maintenance under Section 125
Cr.P.C. against the appellant. This indicated that she had
withdrawn herself from the society of the appellant with
animus desire and to bring cohabitation permanently to an
end and to forsake matrimonial alliance, thereby entitling
the appellant to the remedy of divorce on the ground of
desertion.
The respondent by exercising influence with the police and other local high ups got the FIR lodged in Police
Station Civil Lines, Amritsar by levelling false allegations,
intentionally and deliberately, against the appellant, his
parents and his sister on 20.04.1995.
(3.) THE appellant was not aware of the registration of such FIR. On 13.05.1995, the respondent got father of the
appellant, his father Narinder Dev Sharma, aged 67 years,
his mother - Kamal Kanta, aged about 60 years, and his
sister -Seema, aged about 34 years, arrested by the Amritsar
police. Arrest of the appellant and his family members
caused untold mental agony and harassment to him as also
lowered his social status and of his family members in the
society. False allegations were levelled deliberately with an
intention to malign the social status and reputation of the
appellant. It was also alleged in the F.I.R. that the appellant,
his parents and sister started making demands of more
dowry i.e. Scooter and Colour Television, from the
respondent and the latter also levelled false allegations
regarding the demand of Rs. 50,000/ - from her parents in the
month of January, 1994 and also alleged another demand of
Rs. 1 lac in the month of March, 1994 for investing the same in
the construction of the house.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.