JUDGEMENT
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. -
(1.) LEAVE is granted to place on record additional affidavit of the
appellant along with annexures and the application is allowed.
The assessment of stamp duty on a document purported to
be a Release Deed dated 23.11.2000 under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899
calling upon the appellant to pay a stamp duty of Rs.32,60,800/ - has given
rise to the present dispute.
(2.) LATE Yogender Parkash (brother of the appellant before us) and one Pawan Kumar Sharma, son of the appellant, purchased a piece
of land measuring 3060 square yards in pursuance to a Conveyance Deed
dated 4.8.1972, both having equal shares. This land purchased was a
part of a larger land measuring 7780 square yards standing in the name
of Shri Sehdev Rana, Hardev Sharma and Randev Tyagi comprising
Khasra No.9 and Khatoni No.2230. Thereafter, the vendors and the
vendees are stated to have constituted a partnership firm and started
running a cinema hall on the total land, as referred to aforesaid. It is the
case of the appellant that late Yogender Parkash retired from partnership
business on 26.8.1980, though it is not disputed that the land purchased
by him was never put in the partnership as his contribution nor did he
give the right and interest in the land even while retiring from the
partnership firm.
Late Yogender Parkash passed away on 12.4.1993. As per the additional affidavit now brought on record in pursuance to the
directions passed on the last date of hearing, it has come to light that he
executed a last Will and testament dated 1.1.1993 in favour of his wife
Mrs. Vijay Sharma. The Will in turn bequeathed property situated in
Karnal to be utilized for the welfare of his children being one son and two
daughters while all other properties devolved exclusively on his wife Mrs.
Vijay Sharma. It has also been averred that no one has disputed the
validity and authenticity of the Will.
(3.) IT is after a period of more than seven years after the demise of late Yogender Parkash and the interest in property in question having
exclusively devolved on his wife Mrs. Vijay Sharma as per Will dated
1.1.1993 (devolution taking place on 12.4.1993 being the date of demise of late Yogender Parkash) that a Release deed No.5852 was executed on
23.11.2000 and duly registered with the Sub -Registrar, Yamuna Nagar qua this land in favour of the appellant by Mrs. Vijay Sharma. Thus, Mrs.
Vijay Sharma executed this release deed in favour of the brother of her
husband after seven years of demise of her husband. The case sought to
be built upon is that this is in terms of a late husband's intent towards a
family arrangement. It is not disputed before us that there is nothing to
show on record that late Yogender Parkash ever intended the property in
question to go to his brother. This is more so relevant as the Will is
executed just a few months prior to his demise. The intention, thus, was
to retain title in that property and in turn bequeath the same to his wife
as he did. The devolution thus took place at the time of his death. It is
nobody's case that post the demise of late Yogender Parkash, Mrs. Vijay
Sharma expressed her intention not to accept the bequeath. In such a
situation, if it had so occurred, the property would have devolved on the
remaining Class -I heirs being the son and two daughters.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.