JUDGEMENT
Rajan Gupta, J. -
(1.) INSTANT petition has been filed for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing orders, Annexures P10, P12 & P16 whereby respondent no. 4 was ordered to be appointed as Lambardar of the village.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has assailed the orders only on the ground that authorities below have committed a grave error in rejecting the claim of petitioner. According to him, respondent no. 4 has encroached upon a piece of land owned by Gram Panchayat. Petitioner was, thus, only suitable candidate for appointment as Lambardar. He submits that impugned order is unsustainable and deserves to be set -aside. Heard.
(3.) BRIEF factual background of the case is that after death of Lambardar of village Balluana, process for fresh appointment was initiated. In response to proclamation, 13 candidates applied for the said post. After considering relative merits of candidates, Collector appointed respondent no. 4 as Lambardar vide order dated 25.11.2009. Dis -satisfied by said order, three appeals were filed before Commissioner, Ferozepur Division who vide his common order dated 20.05.2010 dismissed all the appeals and upheld the order of Collector. Said order was unsuccessfully challenged before the revisional authority. Aggrieved, present petition has been filed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.