BIJENDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-2014-11-46
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on November 28,2014

BIJENDER SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This appeal has been preferred against judgment of conviction dated 17.12.2009 and order of sentence dated 21.12.2009 passed by Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, whereby appellant was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'I.P.C.') and 27(1) of Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced as follows:- An F.I.R. No. 177 dated 02.10.2008 was registered at Police Station Badhra, District Bhiwani on the statement of complainant Satyawati wife of Bije Singh @ Sanjay. In her statement (Ex. P15), she had stated that her husband has three brothers namely, Bijender (appellant), Ved Parkash and Rajbir. Her husband wanted to sell two killas of land of his share but appellant Bijender was stopping him from doing so. The appellant along with his family was residing at Rajgarh (Rajasthan) and was a member of Panchayat. He had come to the village for the last three days prior to occurrence. On 02.10.2008, husband of complainant had gone to Dadri in connection with sale of his land and returned home at 06.00 p.m. After taking meal, at about 08.30 p.m., he was rinsing his mouth, when appellant Bijender came from the adjoining house and asked Bije Singh not to sell his share of land, at which Bije Singh apprised him that he had already settled transaction for sale of his share of land. This led to exchange of hot words between them. The appellant went inside giving threat to teach a lesson and brought a gun. He fired two shots, hitting her husband, who died at the spot. Thereafter, appellant asked complainant not to report the matter to police and allured to keep her as his daughter, but at the same time threatened that in the event of matter being reported, she will also be killed. On hearing the sound of gunshots, Rajbir elder brother of husband of complainant and his wife Anita came rushing to the spot and on seeing them, appellant ran away from the spot.
(2.) Rajbir gave the information to Hawa Singh, Sarpanch of village, who further informed the police on telephone. Inspector Krishan Lal, reached the spot and recorded statement of complainant Ex. P15, made his endorsement Ex. P32 on the statement and sent it to police station, where formal F.I.R. Ex. P16 was recorded. He inspected the dead body and a pair of slipper (Chappal) stained with blood, lying at the spot was taken into possession along with blood stained earth vide recovery memo Ex. P21. He prepared inquest report Ex. P20 and sent dead body to General Hospital, Bhiwani for post-mortem examination. The appellant was apprehended on the passage running between village Dagroli and village Aun. Pursuant to his disclosure statement (Ex. P23), appellant got recovered his double barrel gun, five live cartridges, two empty shells and his gun licence which were put in a parcel and taken into possession vide recovery memo Ex. P24.
(3.) Post-mortem examination of deceased Bije Singh @ Sanjay was conducted by Dr. Naresh Kumar Verma (PW 9) along with Dr. Randeep Singh Punia. They found following injuries on the person of deceased:- "(1) There were two entry wounds with inverted margins with blackening and greasy margin placed obliquely on the right side of nose, oval shaped, measuring each 3 X 2 c.m.s with a thin skin partition with blood clots present on the normal site and also on the body and clothes (pant). Dead body was x-rayed and found multiple pellets on the x-ray seen. On further dissection, no distinguished track was found although multiple pellets with 'khol' covers of the 'kartus' non-radio opaque received and sealed.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.