JUDGEMENT
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J. -
(1.) THE present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 21.09.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Karnal dismissing the appeal filed by the present petitioner -convict against the judgment of
conviction dated 18.08.2011 and order of sentence dated 19.08.2011 passed
by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Karnal vide which the
petitioner was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 354,
452 and 506 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and sentenced to undergo one year simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/ - for
commission of offence punishable under Section 354 of IPC; to undergo two
years simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/ - for commission
of offence punishable under Section 452 of IPC and to undergo one year
simple imprisonment for commission of offence punishable under Section
506 of IPC, except that sentence of imprisonment for offence under Section 452 IPC was reduced to one year.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including both the judgments rendered by the Courts below.
Briefly stated, case of prosecution is that complainant is a housewife
having two children. On the night intervening 19.06.2009 she was sleeping
in her house alongwith her children in a room and her husband was
sleeping outside the room in courtyard. At about 1.30 a.m.
petitioner -convict came to her house and entered her room. He bolted the
room from inside and forcibly outraged her modesty and when she raised
hue and cry, he ran away.
After completion of investigation, report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed against the petitioner -convict. He faced
trial. He was convicted and sentenced by learned trial Court as
aforementioned. Appeal filed by him against the judgment of conviction
and order of sentence was also dismissed by learned appellate Court
except to the extent that period of simple imprisonment was reduced from
two years to one year for the offence punishable under Section 452 of IPC.
(3.) IT was stated by learned counsel for the petitioner -convict at the time of issuing notice of motion that he did not want to press the present
revision petition so far as the judgment of conviction as passed by
learned trial Court and as affirmed by learned appellate Court is
concerned. However, he contended that sentence awarded to him was on
higher side. Hence, notice of motion was issued qua quantum of sentence
only.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.