MADHU GUPTA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(P&H)-2014-2-587
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on February 21,2014

MADHU GUPTA Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) THIS order will dispose of the above noted two petitions i.e., CRM -M -1395 -2014 filed by Madhu Gupta and Saurabh Gupta and another CRM -M -2049 -2014 filed by Rohit Gupta, for the grant of pre -arrest bail in a case bearing FIR No.1 dated 2.1.2014, under Sections 420, 406 & 120 -B of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Gobindgarh Mandi, District Fatehgarh Sahib, registered at the instance of Lakhvir Singh, Assistant General Manager, Union Bank of India, Branch Office, Mandi Gobindgarh, alleging that the petitioners are partners of M/s Vishnu Steels, Amloh Road, Mandi Gobindgarh and had availed the cash credit limit facility of Rs.10 crores against the mortgage/hypothecation of raw material, stock of finished/semi -finished/unfinished goods, plant and machinery, electrical equipments and other assets which were lying in the Unit.
(2.) THE plant and machinery had allegedly been dismantled and machinery and material etc., were being shifted in five trucks when the present FIR was registered alleging that wrongful loss has been caused to the Bank on account of misappropriation of the hypothecated material.
(3.) THE matter was enquired into by the police as the petitioners did not return the amount required to be returned to the Bank on 19.7.2013 and a cheque dated 24.7.2013 of Rs.65 lacs issued to the Bank having been dishonoured and the furniture and machinery have been transferred to the other place and sold. It transpired during investigation that the hypothecated goods and machinery have been removed from the premises. After obtaining opinion from the DA (Legal), the above FIR was registered against the petitioners. The petitioner's firm has committed cheating with the complainant bank. The application for pre -arrest bail filed by the petitioners has been dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. At the time of preliminary hearing, a statement was made by the counsel for the petitioners that petitioner Rohit Gupta was ready to discharge the obligation of his liability subject to any other order passed by the Courts/Tribunals of competent jurisdiction as such, interim direction was issued on 21.1.2014 that the petitioner will join investigation on 1.2.2014 and will deposit a sum of Rs.1 crore with the complainant bank. In case of petitioner Rohit Gupta doing so, he was to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. Interim relief was also granted to petitioner Madhu Gupta.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.