JUDGEMENT
SURYA KANT J. -
(1.) THE petitioner, as a sole proprietorship concern, purchased
1/6th share of the land measuring 1 bigha 5 biswa in Khewat No.240 Khata No.413 Khasra No.495 in village Khandsa, District Gurgaon
vide registered sale deed dated 23rd August, 1982. The aforesaid land
was situated within an 'industrial area' where the petitioner also set
up a small scale industrial unit for manufacturing the surgical
equipments like cotton, bandages and other allied products. The
industry was set up under the 'Rural Industry Scheme' floated by the
Haryana Government. It was duly registered as a small scale
industry vide registration No.05/02/25755/RIS/PMT dated 25.11.1984.
The petitioner also obtained drug licence dated 16.03.1985 from the
State Drug Controller. Other requisite permissions were also granted
to it.
(2.) THE State of Haryana vide a notification issued in November, 1993 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in
short, 'the Act') proposed to include the petitioner's land for
acquisition. The petitioner filed objections under Section 5A of the
Act, followed by a representation and on consideration thereof, the
Director, Town and Country Planning vide order dated 09.04.1986
(Annexure P1) released the petitioner's land from acquisition.
The petitioner thereafter is said to have expanded its business and started manufacturing rubber components for auto
control cables and supplied it to different auto industries.
(3.) THE State of Haryana, however, issued another notification dated 22nd July, 1996 (Annexure P6) under Section 4 of the Act
proposing to acquire land of villages Khandsa and Khadipur to utilize
it "for commercial/Local Shopping Centre, Sector 10A, Gurgaon". The
proposed acquisition included the petitioner's land and factory as well.
The petitioner contacted the office of Administrator, Urban Estate,
Gurgaon who informed him that the petitioner's land though was
exempted from acquisition earlier in lieu of which the petitioner was
required to execute an agreement for payment of development charges
for road parking etc., which were not deposited by it, hence the land
was again proposed to be acquired. The petitioner immediately
represented to the authorities that it had executed the agreement and
submitted the same to the office of Director, Urban Estates. The
petitioner's proprietor, however, executed another agreement with
respect to the exemption and re -submitted the same in the office of
the Administrator, Urban Estate, Gurgaon on 05.03.1997 (Annexure
P7). He thereafter represented to the Land Acquisition Collector on
30th April, 1997 but was statedly informed by the authorities that with the expansion of residential zone of Gurgaon, he would not be
allowed to run the factory nor his entire land would be exempted save
the two Shop -cum -Offices sites, to be carved out at the site of his
factory which would be allotted to him and in lieu thereof, a small
part of its land would be needed to straighten the other plot(s). For
this purpose, a site plan was prepared showing the area under
existing structure, proposed area of the Shop -cum -Offices and the
area proposed to be taken from the petitioner or to be given to HUDA
for straight alignment of the Shop -cum -Offices sites.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.