JUDGEMENT
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J. -
(1.) THIS order shall dispose of two appeals Crl. Appeal No.
S -273 -SB of 2002 and Crl. Appeal No. S -295 -SB of 2002. The facts
are being taken from Crl. Appeal No. S -273 -SB of 2002.
Appellants have assailed the judgment and order of
conviction dated 04.02.2002 passed by Additional Sessions Judge,
Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri in FIR No. 233 dated 29.10.1994
registered at Police Station Farakpur under Sections 342/34 IPC.
The challan was filed by the State against four persons,
however, Sahab Singh was acquitted of the charges while Chandgi
Ram, Onkar Singh and Gurdial Singh were convicted under Section
342 IPC and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of one year alongwith fine of Rs. 1,000/ - and in default to undergo simple
imprisonment for two months.
(2.) NOTICING the factual matrix first, Balbir Singh made a statement to the C.I.A. Staff, Yamuna Nagar alleging that his son
Devender Singh alongwith two other Mohan Singh and Manjit Singh
had been picked up by the police in connection with some case and
he had received information on 29.10.1994 at about 2.00 p.m. that all
these three persons had consumed poison while in the custody of
C.I.A. staff Yamuna Nagar and had died. On receipt of this
information, the complainant proceeded to Gaba Hospital, Yamuna
Nagar and identified the bodies in the Dead -house. He further
disclosed that he learnt that all the three had been beaten up by
C.I.A. staff in order to extract confession and had died on account of
the beatings they had received. Allegations were levelled that C.I.A.
staff had forcibly administered poison to make out a case of suicide.
On these allegations, the FIR was registered under
Sections 302, 328 and 342 IPC. The investigation of this case was
handed over to D.S.P. Rajinder Singh by the Superintendent of
Police, Yamuna Nagar. In the report submitted by the police, certain
facts concerning the accused and their family were brought up which
are briefly being referred. According to it, Devender Singh was
residing with Kirpal Kaur though Kirpal Kaur was married to Gurmukh
Singh. Kirpal Kaur had administered poison to the mother of
Gurmukh Singh, who survived and made her stay difficult in the
house, therefore, Kirpal Kaur started living with Rattan Singh who
was her friend. Subsequently, she divorced Gurmukh Singh.
Devender Singh used to visit Rattan Singh, who was a habitual
drinker and had become physically weak. Kirpal Kaur developed
illicit relations with Devender Singh. Rattan Singh was administered
some poisonous substance, which led to his death. The report
refers to the fact that Devender Singh did not have a good reputation
and he had left his wife and had started living with Kirpal Kaur and
was involved in criminal cases and had been sentenced to two years
rigorous imprisonment in one of the cases. The Investigating Team
found that Devender Singh, Manjeet Singh and Mohan Singh had
committed robbery at Shashi Gas Agency in the year 1993 regarding
which FIR No. 77 of 1993 had been registered. The allegations were
that Devender and others went to effect recovery relating to FIR No.
77 of 1993 and they made confessional statement that they had abducted one Manohar Singh, driver of the truck and these trucks
and cylinders had been sold and a case under Section 406 IPC was
registered in 1994 at Police Station Kankhal.
The case of the prosecution was that accused got recovery of 178 Gas cylinders which were looted from Shashi Gas
Agency, Yamuna Nagar. The case of the prosecution further is that
on 28.10.1994 Chandgi Ram, accused took all the three persons to
Haridwar and brought them back to the C.I.A. staff late night at 11.00
p.m. and they were put in the lock up. Devender Singh had
managed to carry poison back with him. The next morning, tea was
ordered from a dhaba for the inmates of the cell and these three
persons died after consuming poison laced tea. The condition of
Devender Singh, Manjit Singh and Mohan Singh started deteriorating
and they were shifted to Gaba Hospital, where they were declared
dead.
(3.) THE postmortem examination showed no injury on any of them. The police collected the material and recorded the statements
and submitted a report under Section 173 C.P.C. The name of Sahab
Singh was placed in column No. 2 and was not challaned.
Charge was framed against Chandgi Ram, Gurdial Singh
and Onkar Singh under Sections 330, 342, 306 read with Section 34
IPC to which all of them pleaded not guilty. The prosecution after
examining 15 witnesses closed its evidence. The prosecution filed
an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon Sahab Singh
which was allowed and the witnesses were recalled for their
examination.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.