JUDGEMENT
RAJAN GUPTA, J. -
(1.) AN incident occurred in Ferozepur City on 01.12.2010. One Kulwant Singh made a statement before the police that he alongwith his
son Inderjit Singh was standing at the gate of their house at 4.30 P.M. At
that time three persons namely, Jitender Mohan alias Kuku, Charan Dass
Handa and Surjit Singh alias Sita came there. They started hurling abuses
at the complainant and his son. Jitender Mohan alias Kuku was armed
with a revolver. As complainant protested, Charan Dass raised a Lalkara
exhorting other accused to teach them a lesson. On this, Surjit Singh
alias Sita pushed the complainant. Jitender Mohan alias Kuku fired two
shots at the complainant, which hit his left bicep and right flank. After
this, accused fled from the scene. Motive of the crime was stated to be
certain property dispute. Jitender Mohan had purchased 36 Marlas of
land out of 84 Marlas adjoining the house of complainant. However, they
wanted to take possession of entire property. On this complaint, FIR
under section 307/34 IPC and sections 25/27/54 of the Arms Act was
registered. On 4.12.2010 complainant succumbed to the injuries suffered
by him. Thus, offence under section 307 IPC was converted to Section
302 IPC. As the accused could not be apprehended by the investigating officer, proceedings under section 82 Cr.P.C. were initiated. On
28.4.2011, court directed the accused to be present before it on 7.5.2011. As the accused failed to appear, they were declared proclaimed offenders.
In the instant petition, petitioners have sought quashing of FIR as well as
orders Annexures P -7 and P -12 declaring them proclaimed offenders.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the various inquiries were conducted during the pendency of the
case. The accused were found innocent. As a result, supplementary
challan under section 173 (8) Cr.P.C. was submitted before the court
exonerating the petitioners. However, they are still shown to be
proclaimed offenders. In view of the cancellation report, orders declaring
them as proclaimed offenders deserve to be set -aside.
Learned State counsel has referred to reply filed by the State and made submissions on same lines. A perusal of the reply shows that
during investigation of the case, an application regarding innocence of
accused was submitted before Inspector General of Police Crime, Punjab.
Said officer entrusted inquiry to Superintendent of Police (Detective),
Moga who found the three accused innocent. As a result, Additional
Director General of Police, Crime, Punjab vide letter No.5466/CR -6
dated 11.03.2011, directed Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur to
get the accused discharged from the case as they were innocent.
(3.) THEREAFTER , Dr. Kaustubh Sharma, IPS, vide his DO letter dated 21.3.2011 wrote to Additional Director General of Police, Punjab that on receipt of
information regarding the occurrence, he alongwith Superintendent of
Police (Detective) and Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur had
visited the place of occurrence. On the spot interrogation was carried out
by him. Several persons named the petitioners as responsible for the
crime. He, thus, requested that inquiry report of Superintendent of Police
(Detective), Moga be reconsidered. However, in response to the DO
letter dated 21.3.2011 written by Dr. Kaustubh Sharma, then Senior
Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur, he received a reply from Additional
Director General of Police, Punjab that matter had been re -examined and
approved by Director General of Police, Punjab. He may, however, carry
out further investigation under his own supervision. Dr. Kaustubh
Sharma thereafter constituted a Special Investigation Team under the
supervision of Superintendent of Police (Detective), Ferozepur consisting
of Incharge, CIA Staff, Ferozepur and SHO, Police Station Ferozepur
City, Ferozepur to investigate the case and arrest the accused. As the
accused kept on evading arrest, proceedings under section 82 was
initiated. They were declared proclaimed offenders by the court of Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur on 7.5.2011. Challan was, thus, prepared
on 13.6.2011 and submitted before the trial court on 21.6.2011.
However, on 23.11.2011, a supplementary challan under section 173 (8)
Cr.P.C. was submitted before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur
showing all the three accused as innocent on the basis of inquiry
conducted by Superintendent of Police (Detective), Moga placing names
of all accused in column No.2 of the final report.;