Ritu Bahri, J. - (1.) THIS petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 07.01.2011 passed by learned Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Ferozepur vide which the claim of the respondent has been allowed by awarding him Rs. 2 lacs as compensation. Brief facts of the case are that on 13.05.2010, thatched cattle shed of respondent No. 2 caught fire as a result of which nine heads of cattle had perished. Respondent No. 2 alleged that the cattle shed had caught fire as a result of sparking from the loose electric wire running over it. He lodged Daily diary report No. 30 dated 14.05.2010 in Police Station, Zira. As per post mortem of the dead animals conducted from Veterinary Hospital, Khosa Dal Singh, the cattle had perished due to burn injuries. Thereafter, Parveen Kumar ASI visited and inspected the spot and he found that the jampers of the electric poles near the cattle shed of the respondent and the electric wires connected therewith were loose, as a result of which there was sparking from the jampers which caused fired to the thatched cattle shed.
(2.) PERMANENT Lok Adalat summoned Bhim Sain Patwari, Didar Singh, Sarpanch, Dalip Singh Ex Sarpanch, Thakar Singh also Ex Sarpanch, Manjinder Singh, Manak Singh and Nachattar Singh, cultivators of village Lehra Rohi where the occurrence had taken place. They deposed that the cattle shed of the applicant had caught fire as a result of sparking from the electric wire. Keeping in view that the incident had taken place on 13.05.2010, when weather was very hot and in such an environment sparking from the jampers of the electric poles is always possible because they are likely to get loose due to the pressure of blow of the hot winds. In that climate, hot winds can carry the sparking to a considerable distance. During those days, catching of fire of a thatched cattle shed which is always vulnerable to fire, as a result of sparking in the jampers at a distance of 12 -13 feet was not impossible. Thus, Rs. 2 lacs had been awarded in favour of the applicant -Mohinder Singh, vide order dated 07.01.2011
(3.) THE petitioner in the present case is challenging the above said order dated 07.01.2011 by making reference to a report dated 28.06.2010 of Asstt. Executive Engineer, Power State Corpn. Ltd. Zira Ferozepur in which it has been stated that at the date of the incident, there was no break -down or tripling where the fire was caught. The incident was not due to the electric shock, but due to some other reason and further the cattle shed of the animals was at the distance of 10 -12' feet from the poles of department and fire could not travel so far even if there was sparking.;