ROHTASH Vs. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.
LAWS(P&H)-2014-10-116
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on October 09,2014

ROHTASH Appellant
VERSUS
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Challenge in this petition is to the letter/decision dated 08.06.2012 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No. 2, disqualifying and cancelling the candidature of the petitioner for the allotment of Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) distributorship at Sambhli under Scheduled Caste category. Pursuant to an advertisement dated 28.02.2011, the petitioner gave his application dated 30.03.2011 for distributorship under the RGGLV at Sambhli, District Karnal. Vide letter dated 02.03.2012 (Annexure P-1), the petitioner was informed that he had qualified for redraw for selection and was required to be present at the given address along with I.D. proof on 23.03.2012. Pursuant to the draw of lots, he was declared a selected candidate vide letter dated 23.12.2012 (Annexure P-2). Subsequently, on field verification, it was found that the land offered by the petitioner in his application form was a simple agreement/ikrarnama and he intimated the Committee vide letter dated 29.03.2012 that he was not having any other land in his/family members' name. He did not fulfill the condition mentioned in Clause 3 (CHH) of the Common Eligibility Criteria published in the advertisement dated 28.02.2011. Therefore, he was disqualified for RGGLV distributorship vide letter/decision dated 08.06.2012 (Annexure P-3).
(2.) The petitioner is seeking quashing of this order on the ground that the agreement to sell with regard to the land in question had been sent along with the application form. He was considered eligible for draw of lots ad was declared successful on 23.03.2012. He acquired title by way of registered sale deed dated 27.03.2012 i.e. prior to the field verification, which was conducted on 29.03.2012. There was no dispute with regard to ownership of the said land. Therefore, he was fully eligible for grant of dealership on the date of physical verification.
(3.) The respondents are refuting the claim of the petitioner on the basis of Clause 4 of the brochure for Selection of Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) Scheme, which reads as under:-- "4. Common Eligibility Criteria for all Categories: Applicant applying for RGGLV should xxxx (g) own a suitable land (plot) of minimum 20 metre X 24 metre in dimension at the advertised RGGLV location for construction of LPG cylinder Storage Godown. Own means having clear ownership title of the property in the name of applicant/family member of the "Family Unit' as defined in multiple dealership/distributorship norm. In case of ownership/co-ownership by family member, consent letter from the family member will be required. Land for construction of Godown will be considered suitable, if it is freely accessible through all weather motorable approach road (public road or private road of the applicant connecting to the pubic road) and should be plain, in one contiguous plot, free from live overhead power transmission or telephone lines. Pipelines/Canals/Drainage/Nallahs should not be passing through the plot." Further, column 9 of the application form reads as under:-- "Do you own a suitable land at advertised location for LPG Godown and showroom? (Own means having clear ownership title of the property in the name of the applicant/family member of the 'Family Unit'. 'Family Unit' of a married applicant, shall consist of self, applicant's spouse and unmarried son(s)/daughter(s) and 'Family Unit' of an unmarried applicant, shall consist of self, applicant's parents and applicant's unmarried brother(s)/sister(s) for the purpose of this entire application. In case of family member, consent letter from the family member will be required.)";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.