JUDGEMENT
SABINA, J. -
(1.) PETITIONER has filed this petition challenging the order dated 05.12.2008 (Annexure P -13) whereby his services were
terminated and Resolution No.90 dated 10.04.2012 (Annexure P -16)
whereby appeal filed by the petitioner, was dismissed.
(2.) THE case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he was working as a Tabla Player on daily wage basis w.e.f. 03.05.1990 with
respondent No.1 at Gurudwara Guru Nanak Darbar, District Hapur
(U.P.) Thereafter, petitioner served at various places and was
transferred to Takhat Sri Damdama Sahib Talwandi Sabo (Bathinda)
vide order dated 01.12.1992. Services of the petitioner were
regularized vide order dated 31.10.1997 and since then, petitioner
was posted at Gurdwara Tohba Bhai Salo Ji, Amritsar. Petitioner had
been performing his duties most diligently but was involved in a false
case at the instance of Bhai Lakhwinder Singh. False allegation was
levelled against the petitioner that he was found sharing room with
Manjit Kaur, although, she was not his legally -wedded wife.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that the allegations levelled against the petitioner were not correct.
Petitioner had been dismissed from service on assumptions.
Petitioner had not been afforded full opportunity to defend himself.
Petitioner had gone to Sri Gurudwara Sahib in question to pay
obeisance along with the lady who was taking music classes from
him.
Learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, has submitted that on 12.03.2008 at about 12.00 p.m.,
petitioner had brought one lady with him to Mata Ganga Niwas at
Gurdwara Beer Baba Budha Ji, Thathha. Petitioner requested
Lakhwinder Singh, Sewadar for a room to rest for two/three hours
and claimed that the lady accompanying him was his wife. However,
it transpired that the lady who was accompanying the petitioner was
not his wife. Thereafter, petitioner admitted that Manjit Kaur
accompanying him was not his wife but used to take music lessons
from him and they had merely come to pay obeisance to Sri
Gurdwara Sahib. After the inquiry petitioner was suspended and a
charge -sheet was issued on 27.09.2008. Petitioner appeared before
the inquiry sub -committee. Petitioner was held guilty by the inquiry
sub -committee and on the basis of the same, termination order was
passed. Appeal filed by the petitioner against the said order, was
dismissed.
(3.) IN the present case, the fact that the petitioner was working as a Tabla Player with respondent No.1 is not in dispute.
Annexure P -1 is the statement signed by the petitioner as well as
Manjit Kaur. A perusal of the same reveals that the petitioner and
Manjit Kaur had gone to visit Gurdwara Sahib and had rested in
Room No.27. From there, they were to go to Taran Sahib. Petitioner
was not related to Manjit Kaur and she was learning music from him.
Manjit Kaur was living in Dashmesh Nagar and was wife of Rajinder
Singh Gill.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.